The Bismarck Mugshots Busted Newspaper Feature That Surprised Readers
Bismarck construction flaws by Monitor » Fri 5:50 pm This subject is often discussed in military and naval circles. Can somebody enumerate Bismarck construction flaws and … Re: Bismarck and her contemporaries by Bgile » Wed 5:50 pm There seems to always be a significant number of duds when heavy armor is encountered. However, a dud … Re: Bismarck at DS after the second turn by Antonio Bonomi » Wed 4:17 am
Lest we forget, Sink the Bismarck was based on the 1959 historical novel Hunting the Bismarck by C.S.Forester. Forester made no pretense about it being anything more than a novel. Bismarck straddled Rodney at 3rd salvo, around 8:51, causing minor splinter damage, followed by an immediate course alteration performed by Rodney (slightly to the N-E), and by KGV … Re: Bismarck/Tirpitz = most powerfull European battleships by Dave Saxton » Tue 2:06 pm In my opinion "Weight of Broadside" is meaningless in 20th century naval warefare. … Re: Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota by lwd » Mon 5:29 pm Usually the term is used in reference to the plane of the material under discussion. If you are talking about … Bismarck analysis Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc. Moderator:Bill Jurens 62 posts Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next alecsandros Senior Member ... Also Bismarck´s difference between standard and full displacement was of just 9,200 tons (22% of her standard displacement) while Titanic´s was of 21,428 tons (86% !!!!). It´s almost twice her … Bismarck at DS after the second turn - Page 16 - Naval History Forums
Bismarck analysis Discussions about the history of the ship, technical details, etc. Moderator:Bill Jurens 62 posts Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next alecsandros Senior Member ... Also Bismarck´s difference between standard and full displacement was of just 9,200 tons (22% of her standard displacement) while Titanic´s was of 21,428 tons (86% !!!!). It´s almost twice her … Bismarck at DS after the second turn - Page 16 - Naval History Forums Bismarck against BB-57 South Dakota - Page 31 - Naval History Forums Bismarck's draft at 49406 tonnes = 10.2 meters. so we subtract 170cm from this @ 48.437 tonnes/cm = 8234 tonnes or 49406 -8234 = 41172 tonnes, which is less than I thought, but if …
